Agile Methodology
Agile Methodology[edit]
A set of iterative and collaborative approaches to **software development** and **project management**, emphasizing adaptability, customer feedback, and incremental delivery.
Remembering (Knowledge / Recall) π§ [edit]
Foundational terms, actors, and artifacts associated with agile practice.
Core terminology & definitions[edit]
- Agile software development β A family of methods focused on iterative planning, continuous delivery, and cross-functional teamwork.
- Scrum β A widely used agile framework structured around sprints, roles, and ceremonies.
- Kanban β A flow-based method emphasizing visualization and work-in-progress limits.
- Agile Manifesto β Statement of values and principles published in 2001.
- Sprint β A short, time-boxed development cycle.
Key components / actors / elements[edit]
- Roles β Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team.
- Artifacts β Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment.
- Ceremonies β Daily Stand-up, Sprint Planning, Review, Retrospective.
- Stakeholders β Customers, end-users, product sponsors.
Canonical models, tools, or artifacts[edit]
- User stories β Brief, user-focused requirements.
- Task boards / Kanban boards β Visual workflow representation.
- Burn-down charts β Remaining work over time.
Typical recall-level facts[edit]
- Origin: Early 2000s, formalized by the Agile Manifesto.
- Domain: Software engineering, project management.
- Common examples: Scrum sprints, Kanban flow systems.
Understanding (Comprehension) π[edit]
Conceptual relationships and operational foundations.
Conceptual relationships & contrasts[edit]
- Agile vs. traditional Waterfall model β iterative vs. linear sequencing.
- Relationship to lean thinking and just-in-time flow.
- Part of broader adaptive methodologies including XP and Crystal.
Core principles & paradigms[edit]
- Continuous customer collaboration.
- Emphasis on working software over comprehensive documentation.
- Adaptive planning with short feedback loops.
- Empowered, cross-functional teams.
How it works (high-level)[edit]
- Inputs β Product vision, backlog items, stakeholder needs.
- Processes β Iterative planning β development β review β retrospective.
- Outputs β Incremental features, feedback-driven backlog updates.
Roles & perspectives[edit]
- Product Owner β Prioritizes customer value.
- Team members β Commit to achievable sprint goals.
- Scrum Master / facilitators β Remove impediments, ensure process health.
- Stakeholders β Provide ongoing feedback and validation.
Applying (Use / Application) π οΈ[edit]
Concrete usage patterns and workflows.
"Hello, World" example[edit]
- Create a minimal backlog with a single user story.
- Run a short planning session.
- Execute a 1β2 day mini-sprint.
- Demo the result and capture feedback.
Core task loops / workflows[edit]
- Groom backlog β Plan sprint β Execute β Review β Retrospect.
- Daily coordination through stand-ups.
- Continuous refinement based on stakeholder input.
Frequently used actions / methods / techniques[edit]
- Writing user stories (βAs a userβ¦ I wantβ¦β).
- Breaking stories into tasks.
- Estimating via planning poker.
- Maintaining a visible board.
- Running retrospectives.
Real-world use cases[edit]
- Software feature development in cross-functional teams.
- Managing marketing campaign cycles.
- Rapid prototyping in startups.
- Complex systems requiring incremental risk mitigation.
Analyzing (Break Down / Analysis) π¬[edit]
Structure, trade-offs, and diagnostic insights.
Comparative analysis[edit]
- vs. Waterfall: flexibility vs. predictability.
- vs. Lean: similar flow focus, but lean stresses waste elimination.
- vs. DevOps: agile focuses on development rhythms; DevOps extends into deployment/operations.
Structural insights[edit]
- Iteration as fundamental unit of planning.
- Dual-loop structure: delivery loop (sprint) + improvement loop (retro).
- Dependency on empowered teams and fast feedback.
Failure modes & root causes[edit]
- Cargo-cult agile: ceremony without mindset.
- Overloaded backlogs with unclear prioritization.
- Excessive work-in-progress blocking flow.
- Inconsistent stakeholder participation.
Troubleshooting & observability[edit]
- Monitor lead time, cycle time, throughput.
- Inspect sprint burndown for volatility.
- Listen for recurring impediments in stand-ups.
- Use retro action items as health indicators.
Creating (Synthesis / Create) ποΈ[edit]
Designing and extending agile practices.
Design patterns & best practices[edit]
- Split large stories into INVEST-compliant items.
- Keep WIP low to maximize flow.
- Establish clear Definition of Done.
- Use lightweight documentation aligned with user needs.
Integration & extension strategies[edit]
- Combine with DevOps pipelines for continuous delivery.
- Pair with lean portfolio management for strategic alignment.
- Integrate UX research cycles into sprints.
- Adapt ceremonies for distributed teams.
Security, governance, or ethical considerations[edit]
- Incorporate secure coding tasks within backlogs.
- Ensure compliance stories are visible and prioritized.
- Protect team well-being through sustainable pace.
Lifecycle management strategies[edit]
- Evolve processes through regular retrospectives.
- Adjust sprint length as team maturity changes.
- Migrate legacy processes incrementally to avoid disruption.
Evaluating (Judgment / Evaluation) βοΈ[edit]
Assessing effectiveness and fit.
Evaluation frameworks & tools[edit]
- Team health checks and maturity models.
- Velocity trends (used cautiously).
- Flow metrics: cycle time, throughput, WIP.
- Stakeholder satisfaction surveys.
Maturity & adoption models[edit]
- Often mainstream in software engineering.
- Scaled variants such as SAFe, LeSS, and Scrum@Scale.
- Barriers: organizational inertia, unclear product ownership.
Key benefits & limitations[edit]
- Benefits: adaptability, early value, reduced risk.
- Limitations: requires engaged stakeholders, disciplined teams.
- Weak in environments demanding fixed long-term scope up front.
Strategic decision criteria[edit]
- Choose agile when requirements evolve and feedback is frequent.
- Avoid when heavy regulatory constraints require extensive upfront detail.
- Consider hybrid models for mixed-context projects.
Holistic impact analysis[edit]
- Encourages transparency and autonomy.
- Can reshape organizational culture toward experimentation.
- Future trajectory: stronger integration with DevOps, AI-assisted planning, and continuous discovery.