Agile Methodology

From BloomWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Agile Methodology[edit]

A set of iterative and collaborative approaches to **software development** and **project management**, emphasizing adaptability, customer feedback, and incremental delivery.

Remembering (Knowledge / Recall) 🧠[edit]

Foundational terms, actors, and artifacts associated with agile practice.

Core terminology & definitions[edit]

  • Agile software development – A family of methods focused on iterative planning, continuous delivery, and cross-functional teamwork.
  • Scrum – A widely used agile framework structured around sprints, roles, and ceremonies.
  • Kanban – A flow-based method emphasizing visualization and work-in-progress limits.
  • Agile Manifesto – Statement of values and principles published in 2001.
  • Sprint – A short, time-boxed development cycle.

Key components / actors / elements[edit]

  • Roles – Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team.
  • Artifacts – Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment.
  • Ceremonies – Daily Stand-up, Sprint Planning, Review, Retrospective.
  • Stakeholders – Customers, end-users, product sponsors.

Canonical models, tools, or artifacts[edit]

  • User stories – Brief, user-focused requirements.
  • Task boards / Kanban boards – Visual workflow representation.
  • Burn-down charts – Remaining work over time.

Typical recall-level facts[edit]

  • Origin: Early 2000s, formalized by the Agile Manifesto.
  • Domain: Software engineering, project management.
  • Common examples: Scrum sprints, Kanban flow systems.

Understanding (Comprehension) πŸ“–[edit]

Conceptual relationships and operational foundations.

Conceptual relationships & contrasts[edit]

  • Agile vs. traditional Waterfall model – iterative vs. linear sequencing.
  • Relationship to lean thinking and just-in-time flow.
  • Part of broader adaptive methodologies including XP and Crystal.

Core principles & paradigms[edit]

  • Continuous customer collaboration.
  • Emphasis on working software over comprehensive documentation.
  • Adaptive planning with short feedback loops.
  • Empowered, cross-functional teams.

How it works (high-level)[edit]

  • Inputs – Product vision, backlog items, stakeholder needs.
  • Processes – Iterative planning β†’ development β†’ review β†’ retrospective.
  • Outputs – Incremental features, feedback-driven backlog updates.

Roles & perspectives[edit]

  • Product Owner – Prioritizes customer value.
  • Team members – Commit to achievable sprint goals.
  • Scrum Master / facilitators – Remove impediments, ensure process health.
  • Stakeholders – Provide ongoing feedback and validation.

Applying (Use / Application) πŸ› οΈ[edit]

Concrete usage patterns and workflows.

"Hello, World" example[edit]

  • Create a minimal backlog with a single user story.
  • Run a short planning session.
  • Execute a 1–2 day mini-sprint.
  • Demo the result and capture feedback.

Core task loops / workflows[edit]

  • Groom backlog β†’ Plan sprint β†’ Execute β†’ Review β†’ Retrospect.
  • Daily coordination through stand-ups.
  • Continuous refinement based on stakeholder input.

Frequently used actions / methods / techniques[edit]

  • Writing user stories (β€œAs a user… I want…”).
  • Breaking stories into tasks.
  • Estimating via planning poker.
  • Maintaining a visible board.
  • Running retrospectives.

Real-world use cases[edit]

  • Software feature development in cross-functional teams.
  • Managing marketing campaign cycles.
  • Rapid prototyping in startups.
  • Complex systems requiring incremental risk mitigation.

Analyzing (Break Down / Analysis) πŸ”¬[edit]

Structure, trade-offs, and diagnostic insights.

Comparative analysis[edit]

  • vs. Waterfall: flexibility vs. predictability.
  • vs. Lean: similar flow focus, but lean stresses waste elimination.
  • vs. DevOps: agile focuses on development rhythms; DevOps extends into deployment/operations.

Structural insights[edit]

  • Iteration as fundamental unit of planning.
  • Dual-loop structure: delivery loop (sprint) + improvement loop (retro).
  • Dependency on empowered teams and fast feedback.

Failure modes & root causes[edit]

  • Cargo-cult agile: ceremony without mindset.
  • Overloaded backlogs with unclear prioritization.
  • Excessive work-in-progress blocking flow.
  • Inconsistent stakeholder participation.

Troubleshooting & observability[edit]

  • Monitor lead time, cycle time, throughput.
  • Inspect sprint burndown for volatility.
  • Listen for recurring impediments in stand-ups.
  • Use retro action items as health indicators.

Creating (Synthesis / Create) πŸ—οΈ[edit]

Designing and extending agile practices.

Design patterns & best practices[edit]

  • Split large stories into INVEST-compliant items.
  • Keep WIP low to maximize flow.
  • Establish clear Definition of Done.
  • Use lightweight documentation aligned with user needs.

Integration & extension strategies[edit]

  • Combine with DevOps pipelines for continuous delivery.
  • Pair with lean portfolio management for strategic alignment.
  • Integrate UX research cycles into sprints.
  • Adapt ceremonies for distributed teams.

Security, governance, or ethical considerations[edit]

  • Incorporate secure coding tasks within backlogs.
  • Ensure compliance stories are visible and prioritized.
  • Protect team well-being through sustainable pace.

Lifecycle management strategies[edit]

  • Evolve processes through regular retrospectives.
  • Adjust sprint length as team maturity changes.
  • Migrate legacy processes incrementally to avoid disruption.

Evaluating (Judgment / Evaluation) βš–οΈ[edit]

Assessing effectiveness and fit.

Evaluation frameworks & tools[edit]

  • Team health checks and maturity models.
  • Velocity trends (used cautiously).
  • Flow metrics: cycle time, throughput, WIP.
  • Stakeholder satisfaction surveys.

Maturity & adoption models[edit]

  • Often mainstream in software engineering.
  • Scaled variants such as SAFe, LeSS, and Scrum@Scale.
  • Barriers: organizational inertia, unclear product ownership.

Key benefits & limitations[edit]

  • Benefits: adaptability, early value, reduced risk.
  • Limitations: requires engaged stakeholders, disciplined teams.
  • Weak in environments demanding fixed long-term scope up front.

Strategic decision criteria[edit]

  • Choose agile when requirements evolve and feedback is frequent.
  • Avoid when heavy regulatory constraints require extensive upfront detail.
  • Consider hybrid models for mixed-context projects.

Holistic impact analysis[edit]

  • Encourages transparency and autonomy.
  • Can reshape organizational culture toward experimentation.
  • Future trajectory: stronger integration with DevOps, AI-assisted planning, and continuous discovery.