Prospect Theory - Revision history

Wordpad: BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

2026-04-25T01:56:21Z

BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 25 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div style="background-color: #4B0082; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
	{{BloomIntro}}		{{BloomIntro}}
	Prospect Theory is the "Study of the Choice"—the investigation of the "Psychological Discovery" (1979) that "Humans" "Do Not" "Evaluate" "Losses and Gains" "Equally." While "Classical Economics" (see Article 138) assumes we are "Rational Actors" (Homo Economicus), Prospect Theory proves we are "Irrationally Risk-Averse." From the "Loss Aversion" of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky to "Framing Effects" and "Probability Weighting," this field explores the "Biases of the Mind." It is the science of "Subjective Value," explaining why "Losing $100" "Hurts More" than "Winning $100" "Feels Good"—and how "Psychology" "Rewrote" the "Laws of the Market."		Prospect Theory is the "Study of the Choice"—the investigation of the "Psychological Discovery" (1979) that "Humans" "Do Not" "Evaluate" "Losses and Gains" "Equally." While "Classical Economics" (see Article 138) assumes we are "Rational Actors" (Homo Economicus), Prospect Theory proves we are "Irrationally Risk-Averse." From the "Loss Aversion" of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky to "Framing Effects" and "Probability Weighting," this field explores the "Biases of the Mind." It is the science of "Subjective Value," explaining why "Losing $100" "Hurts More" than "Winning $100" "Feels Good"—and how "Psychology" "Rewrote" the "Laws of the Market."
			</div>

	== Remembering ==		__TOC__

			<div style="background-color: #000080; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Remembering</span> ==
	* '''Prospect Theory''' — A theory of "Decision-making" under "Uncertainty" that "Replaced" "Expected Utility Theory."		* '''Prospect Theory''' — A theory of "Decision-making" under "Uncertainty" that "Replaced" "Expected Utility Theory."
	* '''Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky''' — The "Founders": they "Combined" "Psychology" and "Economics," leading to a "Nobel Prize."		* '''Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky''' — The "Founders": they "Combined" "Psychology" and "Economics," leading to a "Nobel Prize."
Line 13:		Line 18:
	* '''Endowment Effect''' — The "Bias" where people "Value" "Something they Own" "More" than the "Same Item" if they didn't own it.		* '''Endowment Effect''' — The "Bias" where people "Value" "Something they Own" "More" than the "Same Item" if they didn't own it.
	* '''Status Quo Bias''' — The "Preference" for the "Current Situation" even if a "Better Alternative" exists.		* '''Status Quo Bias''' — The "Preference" for the "Current Situation" even if a "Better Alternative" exists.
			</div>

	== Understanding ==		<div style="background-color: #006400; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Understanding</span> ==
	Prospect theory is understood through '''Loss''' and '''Relative Value'''.		Prospect theory is understood through '''Loss''' and '''Relative Value'''.

Line 40:		Line 47:

	'''Kahneman’s 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' (2011)'''': The "Bible" of the field. It introduced the world to "System 1" (Fast/Intuitive/Biased) and "System 2" (Slow/Logical/Lazy). It proved that "Behavioral Economics" is the "Study of how System 1 Hijacks System 2."		'''Kahneman’s 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' (2011)'''': The "Bible" of the field. It introduced the world to "System 1" (Fast/Intuitive/Biased) and "System 2" (Slow/Logical/Lazy). It proved that "Behavioral Economics" is the "Study of how System 1 Hijacks System 2."
			</div>

	== Applying ==		<div style="background-color: #8B0000; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Applying</span> ==
	'''Modeling 'The Loss Aversion' (Predicting 'Bet Acceptance'):'''		'''Modeling 'The Loss Aversion' (Predicting 'Bet Acceptance'):'''
	<syntaxhighlight lang="python">		<syntaxhighlight lang="python">
Line 70:		Line 79:
	: '''Mental Accounting''' (Thaler) → The "Bias" where people "Treat Money Differently" depending on its "Category" (e.g. 'Bonus money' vs 'Salary').		: '''Mental Accounting''' (Thaler) → The "Bias" where people "Treat Money Differently" depending on its "Category" (e.g. 'Bonus money' vs 'Salary').
	: '''Hyperbolic Discounting''' → The "Bias" where we "Value" "Now" "Way More" than "Tomorrow," "Explaining" why we "Fail" to "Save for Retirement" or "Diet."		: '''Hyperbolic Discounting''' → The "Bias" where we "Value" "Now" "Way More" than "Tomorrow," "Explaining" why we "Fail" to "Save for Retirement" or "Diet."
			</div>

	== Analyzing ==		<div style="background-color: #8B4500; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Analyzing</span> ==
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+ Neoclassical vs. Behavioral Economics		\|+ Neoclassical vs. Behavioral Economics
Line 87:		Line 98:

	'''The Concept of "Bounded Rationality"''': Analyzing "The Constraint." Herbert Simon (see Article 514) argued that we "Aren't Lazy"—we just have "Limited Brainpower" and "Limited Time." We don't "Optimize" (Find the best); we "Satisfice" (Find 'Good Enough'). "Prospect Theory" is the "Map" of our "Satisficing Shortcuts."		'''The Concept of "Bounded Rationality"''': Analyzing "The Constraint." Herbert Simon (see Article 514) argued that we "Aren't Lazy"—we just have "Limited Brainpower" and "Limited Time." We don't "Optimize" (Find the best); we "Satisfice" (Find 'Good Enough'). "Prospect Theory" is the "Map" of our "Satisficing Shortcuts."
			</div>

	== Evaluating ==		<div style="background-color: #483D8B; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Evaluating</span> ==
	Evaluating Prospect Theory:		Evaluating Prospect Theory:
	# '''Universality''': Does "Loss Aversion" apply to "Professional Traders"? (Or can you 'Learn' to be 'Rational'?).		# '''Universality''': Does "Loss Aversion" apply to "Professional Traders"? (Or can you 'Learn' to be 'Rational'?).
Line 94:		Line 107:
	# '''Policy''': (See Article 620). Should "Governments" "Frame" "Taxes" as "Losses" or "Contributions"?		# '''Policy''': (See Article 620). Should "Governments" "Frame" "Taxes" as "Losses" or "Contributions"?
	# '''Impact''': Why did "Behavioral Economics" "Fail" to "Predict" the 2008 Financial Crisis?		# '''Impact''': Why did "Behavioral Economics" "Fail" to "Predict" the 2008 Financial Crisis?
			</div>

	== Creating ==		<div style="background-color: #2F4F4F; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
			== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Creating</span> ==
	Future Frontiers:		Future Frontiers:
	# '''Personalized 'Bias' AI''': An "App" that "Tracks your Spending" and "Alerts you" when your "Loss Aversion" is "Making a Bad Choice."		# '''Personalized 'Bias' AI''': An "App" that "Tracks your Spending" and "Alerts you" when your "Loss Aversion" is "Making a Bad Choice."
Line 109:		Line 124:
	[[Category:Decision Science]]		[[Category:Decision Science]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]
			</div>

Wordpad: BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

2026-04-23T17:15:29Z

BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

Show changes

Wordpad: BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

2026-04-23T15:35:18Z

BloomWiki: Prospect Theory

New page

{{BloomIntro}}
Prospect Theory is the "Psychology of Choice"—the Nobel Prize-winning discovery that humans don't make "Rational" decisions based on math, but "Emotional" decisions based on "Gains and Losses." Developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, it challenges the idea of the "Economic Man" who always picks the best option. Instead, it proves that we "Hate losing" much more than we "Love winning" (Loss Aversion) and that we think about "Changes" in our wealth rather than our "Total" wealth. From the way we "Hold onto bad stocks" to how we "Fear rare risks," prospect theory is the foundation of behavioral economics. It is the science of why we are "Predictably Irrational" when it comes to money and life.

== Remembering ==
* '''Prospect Theory''' — A theory that describes how people choose between probabilistic alternatives that involve risk, where the probabilities of outcomes are known.
* '''Loss Aversion''' — The phenomenon where "Losses loom larger than gains"; the "Pain" of losing $100 is twice as strong as the "Joy" of gaining $100.
* '''Reference Point''' — The "Starting point" from which you judge a gain or a loss (e.g., your current bank balance or your expected salary).
* '''Diminishing Sensitivity''' — The idea that the difference between $0 and $100 feels "Huge," but the difference between $1,000 and $1,100 feels "Small."
* '''Probability Weighting''' — The tendency to "Over-estimate" small chances (like the Lottery or a Plane crash) and "Under-estimate" high chances (like the flu).
* '''Certainty Effect''' — The preference for "Sure things" over "Risks," even if the risk has a higher mathematical value.
* '''Framing Effect''' — How the "Way a choice is presented" changes the decision (e.g., "90% Fat-Free" vs "10% Fat").
* '''Daniel Kahneman''' — The psychologist who won the Nobel Prize in Economics for this theory (author of 'Thinking, Fast and Slow').
* '''Amos Tversky''' — Kahneman's brilliant partner who co-developed the theory.
* '''The Value Function''' — The "S-shaped" curve that shows how we perceive value differently for gains (concave) and losses (convex).

== Understanding ==
Prospect theory is understood through '''Loss''' and '''Framing'''.

'''1. Loss Aversion (The "Pain" of Money)''':
Humans are "Risk-Averse" for gains but "Risk-Seeking" for losses.
* **Gains**: If I offer you $50 for sure, or a 50% chance at $100, you will take the **Sure $50**.
* **Losses**: If I tell you that you will lose $50 for sure, or have a 50% chance to lose $100, you will **Take the Risk** to avoid the loss.
* This is why people "Keep gambling" when they are losing—they are "Seeking risk" to get back to zero.

'''2. The Reference Point (Context is Everything)''':
You don't care about your "Total Net Worth."
* If you expect a $10,000 bonus and get $5,000, you feel "Poor" (A Loss).
* If you expect no bonus and get $1,000, you feel "Rich" (A Gain).
* Happiness is determined by "Changes," not by "Levels."

'''3. Probability Weighting (The Lottery Effect)''':
We are "Bad" at understanding small numbers.
* A "1 in a Million" chance of winning a lottery feels "Possible."
* A "1 in a Million" chance of a side effect from a vaccine feels "Scary."
* We "Over-react" to the "Ends" of the distribution and "Under-react" to the "Middle."

'''The 'Diseases' Experiment'''': Kahneman and Tversky asked people to choose between two treatments for a disease. Group A was told: "200 people will be saved." Group B was told: "400 people will die." Even though the math was the same, people chose the first option because it was "Framed as a Gain." This proved that "Words matter more than Math" in human choice.

== Applying ==
'''Modeling 'The Loss Aversion' (Predicting if a person will accept a bet):'''
<syntaxhighlight lang="python">
def evaluate_gamble(win_amount, lose_amount, probability=0.5):
"""
Shows that people need a 2x Gain to justify a 1x Loss.
"""
# Rational Utility: (Win * P) - (Lose * (1-P))
rational_utility = (win_amount * probability) - (lose_amount * (1 - probability))

# Behavioral Utility: (Win * P) - (2 * Lose * (1-P))
# Note: The '2' is the 'Loss Aversion Coefficient'
psychological_utility = (win_amount * probability) - (2 * lose_amount * (1 - probability))

if psychological_utility > 0:
return f"Rational: {rational_utility} | Behavioral: {psychological_utility} | RESULT: TAKE THE BET."
else:
return f"Rational: {rational_utility} | Behavioral: {psychological_utility} | RESULT: REJECT THE BET."

# A 'Fair' bet: Win 100, Lose 100.
print(evaluate_gamble(100, 100))
# A 'Good' bet: Win 250, Lose 100.
print(evaluate_gamble(250, 100))
</syntaxhighlight>

; Prospect Landmarks
: '''The 'Endowment Effect'''' → Why you think your "Old Coffee Mug" is worth $10 when everyone else thinks it's worth $2. Because you "Own it," losing it feels like a "Loss," so you over-value it.
: '''Sunk Cost Fallacy''' → Why we "Stay in a bad relationship" or "Finish a bad movie." We don't want the "Past time/money" to be a "Loss," so we "Waste more time" trying to save it.
: '''Insurance Sales''' → How companies sell you "Extended Warranties." They frame a $50 payment as "Protection against a $500 Loss," hitting your "Loss Aversion" button.
: '''The 'Status Quo' Bias''' → Why we "Don't change our bank" or "Our internet provider," even if we can save money. Changing feels like a "Risk," so we "Stick with what we know."

== Analyzing ==
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Rational Man vs. Behavioral Human
! Feature !! Rational (Expected Utility) !! Behavioral (Prospect Theory)
|-
| Goal || Maximize Total Wealth || Avoid "Losses" relative to a point
|-
| Risk View || Consistent (Always the same) || Inconsistent (Depends on Gain/Loss)
|-
| Probabilities || Handled Linearly (0.5 = 0.5) || Weighted (0.01 feels like 0.05)
|-
| Analogy || A 'Calculator' || A 'Storyteller'
|}

'''The Concept of "Reflection"''': Analyzing the "Mirror Effect." If you "Flip" a positive problem into a negative one, the human brain "Flips" its behavior. We move from "Playing it Safe" (Gains) to "Gambling Everything" (Losses). This explains why a "Losing Gambler" becomes "More and More Dangerous" as the night goes on.

== Evaluating ==
Evaluating prospect theory:
# '''The "Expert" Defense''': Do "Experts" (like Professional Traders) still suffer from loss aversion, or can you "Train" the brain to be rational?
# '''Culture''': Does a "Culture of Honor" or "Scarcity" make loss aversion "Stronger"?
# '''Happiness''': If we only care about "Changes," can we ever be "Permanently Happy," or are we "Doomed" to the "Hedonic Treadmill" (needing more and more to feel a 'Gain')?
# '''AI''': Should we program AIs to be "Rational" (like a calculator) or "Behavioral" (to understand and help humans)?

== Creating ==
Future Frontiers:
# '''Loss-Aversion "Therapy"''': Using VR to "Practice" losing small amounts of money to "De-sensitize" the brain, allowing for more rational investing.
# '''Hyper-Personalized Nudges''': An app that "Knows your reference point" and "Frames" healthy choices (like Exercise) as a "Gain" for you specifically.
# '''Policy Design''': Governments that "Auto-Enroll" people in savings accounts, using the "Status Quo Bias" to help people save for retirement.
# '''The 'Rationality' Assistant''': A real-time AI that "Flags" your decisions: "Warning: You are only making this choice because you are afraid of a loss. The math says you should take the risk."

[[Category:Economics]]
[[Category:Psychology]]
[[Category:Decision Science]]
[[Category:Behavioral Economics]]