Editing
Bloom Taxonomy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
= Bloom Taxonomy = [[File:Bloom.png|thumb]] == Remembering (Knowledge / Recall) == 🧠 At this level, an expert can **define** Bloom’s taxonomy and **name** its foundational terms, contributors, versions, and common usage contexts. * '''Core terminology & definitions''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy Bloom's taxonomy]''' – A hierarchical framework for classifying educational learning objectives in the '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_domain cognitive domain]''', progressing from simple recall to complex creation. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_domain Cognitive domain]''' – The area of learning related to mental skills, knowledge acquisition, and reasoning. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affective_domain Affective domain]''' – The learning domain involving attitudes, emotions, values, and feelings. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychomotor_learning Psychomotor domain]''' – The learning domain focused on physical movement, coordination, and motor skills. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_objective Learning objective]''' – A measurable statement describing what a learner should know or do after instruction. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_outcome Learning outcome]''' – The demonstrated result or performance showing that learning has occurred. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy_of_educational_objectives Taxonomy of Educational Objectives]''' – The original publication series introducing Bloom’s taxonomy. * '''Key contributors''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Bloom Benjamin Bloom]''' – Educational psychologist who led the committee that developed the taxonomy. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Krathwohl David Krathwohl]''' – Co-author of the taxonomy and contributor to the revised version. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorin_W._Anderson Lorin Anderson]''' – Former student of Bloom who co-led the 2001 revision. * '''Canonical versions''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy#Original_taxonomy Original 1956 taxonomy]''' – Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy#Revised_taxonomy Revised 2001 taxonomy]''' – Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create. * '''Where Bloom’s taxonomy is commonly seen''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education Education]''' – Curriculum development, lesson planning, learning progressions. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructional_design Instructional design]''' – Structuring learning activities and assessments. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_assessment Educational assessment]''' – Categorizing question difficulty and cognitive demand. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teacher_education Teacher education]''' – Training educators in objective-writing and pedagogy. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_training Corporate training]''' – Designing workplace learning pathways and upskilling programs. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_management_system Learning management systems]''' – Tagging objectives and item banks by Bloom level. * '''Typical recall-level facts''' ** Bloom’s taxonomy contains **six cognitive levels** in its revised form. ** It originated in the **United States** in the **1950s**. ** It is one of the **most widely used educational frameworks** worldwide. ** It appears in textbooks, standards documents, teacher preparation programs, and training manuals. == Understanding (Comprehension) == 📖 At this level, an expert can **explain**, **summarize**, and **compare** concepts related to Bloom’s taxonomy and describe how its pieces fit together. * '''Conceptual relationships & contrasts''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy#Original_taxonomy Original Bloom’s taxonomy]''' vs. '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy#Revised_taxonomy Revised taxonomy]''' – The former uses noun-based level names; the latter uses action verbs and places "Create" above "Evaluate." ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_domain Cognitive domain]''' vs. '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affective_domain Affective domain]''' vs. '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychomotor_learning Psychomotor domain]''' – Three complementary learning domains, not competing models. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLO_taxonomy SOLO taxonomy]''' – An alternative framework focused on structural complexity rather than cognitive processes. * '''Core principles & paradigms''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy Hierarchical learning progression]''' – Complex reasoning builds upon foundational knowledge. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(philosophy_of_education) Constructivist learning theory]''' – Learners actively construct meaning rather than absorb facts. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaffolding Novice-to-expert scaffolding]''' – Instruction should guide learners upward through cognitive levels. * '''Core operational concepts — how Bloom’s taxonomy works''' ** Levels signal the **expected cognitive demand**, not task difficulty or time required. ** Action verbs help classify tasks, but must be interpreted within context. ** Assessments, instruction, and objectives should remain **aligned** across levels. * '''Producer vs. consumer perspectives''' ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructional_design Instructional designer]''' – Uses Bloom to craft measurable, level-appropriate objectives. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teacher Teacher]''' – Selects activities and assessments targeting specific Bloom levels. ** '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student Student]''' – Demonstrates mastery through performance aligned with the intended cognitive level. * '''Typical comprehension-level abilities''' ** Can restate the purpose of Bloom’s taxonomy. ** Can explain why multiple levels exist. ** Can distinguish remembering from understanding, and understanding from applying. ** Can summarize the impact of Bloom’s taxonomy on modern education. == Applying (Use / Application) == 🛠️ At this level, an expert can **use** Bloom’s taxonomy in real instructional, assessment, or design situations. * '''"Hello, World" examples''' ** Writing measurable learning objectives using Bloom-level verbs. ** Rewriting existing test questions to intentionally target a higher/lower cognitive level. * '''Guides for core task loops''' ** Using the taxonomy within '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backward_design backward design]''' — define outcomes → plan assessments → plan instruction. ** Applying Bloom levels during '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curriculum curriculum]''' alignment and course sequencing. ** Categorizing exam items with '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_assessment educational assessment]''' frameworks. * '''Reference of common actions / “cheatsheet”''' ** Remember → list, define, label ** Understand → summarize, interpret, classify ** Apply → execute, demonstrate, implement ** Analyze → compare, differentiate, attribute ** Evaluate → judge, justify, critique ** Create → design, produce, generate * '''Contextual use cases''' ** Mapping training activities in '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_training corporate learning programs]'''. ** Designing question banks in a '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_management_system learning management system]'''. ** Ensuring alignment in multi-instructor courses or programs. * '''Typical application-level abilities''' ** Can classify instructional materials by Bloom level. ** Can select appropriate teaching strategies for each level. ** Can revise objectives to improve clarity and measurability. ---- == Analyzing (Break Down / Analysis) == 🔬 At this level, an expert can **examine structure**, **identify patterns**, and **compare** Bloom’s taxonomy with alternatives. * '''Comparative analysis''' ** Bloom’s taxonomy vs. '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLO_taxonomy SOLO taxonomy]''' — cognitive processes vs. structural complexity. ** Bloom’s taxonomy vs. '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andragogy andragogy]''' — task complexity vs. adult-learning orientation. * '''Failure modes & root causes''' ** Treating Bloom levels as a ranking of **worthiness**, not cognitive demand. ** Over-reliance on verb lists without examining assignment context. ** Assuming every lesson must target the highest level. * '''Troubleshooting & observability techniques''' ** Conducting a '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curriculum_mapping curriculum map]''' to detect level imbalance (too much recall, not enough analysis). ** Reviewing assessment validity through '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_analytics learning analytics]''' and performance patterns. ** Spot-checking rubrics for alignment drift. * '''Structural insights''' ** Bloom’s taxonomy organizes cognitive skills **hierarchically**, not categorically. ** Levels support **progression**, not segmentation — learners move fluidly. * '''Typical analysis-level abilities''' ** Can critique a lesson plan using Bloom’s taxonomy. ** Can identify mismatched objectives, activities, and assessments. ** Can explain why a task belongs to a specific level. ---- == Creating (Synthesis / Create) == 🏗️ At this level, an expert can **design**, **invent**, and **integrate** Bloom’s taxonomy into new instructional systems or models. * '''Design patterns & best practices''' ** Using Bloom levels to scaffold increasingly complex learning experiences. ** Embedding Bloom-aligned formative assessments into teaching cycles. * '''Ethical & equity considerations''' ** Ensuring all learners—not only advanced ones—access higher-order thinking. ** Avoiding structural bias in expectations or learning pathways. * '''Lifecycle management strategies''' ** Periodically revising program objectives to reflect evolving competencies. ** Maintaining consistency across departments, schools, or institutions. * '''Scalability & optimization patterns''' ** Integrating taxonomy tagging into question banks in a '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_management_system learning management system]'''. ** Using Bloom-based metadata for adaptive-learning personalization. * '''Typical creation-level abilities''' ** Can build new curricula around progressive cognitive development. ** Can design assessments intentionally targeting higher levels. ** Can create institution-wide Bloom usage guidelines. ---- == Evaluating (Judgment / Evaluation) == ⚖️ At this level, an expert can **judge effectiveness**, **assess quality**, and **make strategic decisions** about Bloom’s taxonomy in practice. * '''Evaluation frameworks & tools''' ** Measuring alignment through '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_evaluation program evaluation]'''. ** Reviewing assessment rigor using '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_measurement educational measurement]''' methods. ** Determining instructional impact via '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_engagement student engagement]''' indicators. * '''Maturity & adoption models''' ** Analyzing institutional uptake using '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations diffusion of innovations]''' theory. ** Considering organizational readiness, training, and support resources. * '''Key performance indicators''' ** Distribution of learning outcomes across Bloom levels. ** Assessment validity, knowledge transfer, retention, and performance. * '''Strategic decision criteria''' ** Whether Bloom’s taxonomy or '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLO_taxonomy SOLO taxonomy]''' better fits specific instructional goals. ** Cost–benefit trade-offs for training, implementation, and maintenance. * '''Holistic impact analysis''' ** Workload, clarity, pedagogical benefit, faculty adoption, student experience. ** Alignment with broader '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedagogy pedagogy]''' and '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_policy education policy]''' frameworks. * '''Typical evaluation-level abilities''' ** Can judge whether Bloom’s taxonomy is being applied appropriately. ** Can recommend improvements based on evidence and outcomes. ** Can determine whether Bloom is the right framework for the context. [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Instructional Design]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to BloomWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
BloomWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information