Editing AppDynamics

= AppDynamics =
<!-- One-sentence neutral definition of the topic -->
AppDynamics is a full-stack application performance management (APM) and observability platform that monitors application code, infrastructure, databases, and user experience across distributed systems.

== Remembering (Knowledge / Recall) ==
🧠 List the foundational vocabulary and factual knowledge an expert should be able to recall.

=== Core terminology & definitions ===
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppDynamics AppDynamics]''' – Cisco-owned platform for monitoring distributed application performance.
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_performance_management Application Performance Management (APM)]''' – Monitoring and managing performance and availability of applications.
* '''Business Transaction (BT)''' – AppDynamics’ logical unit of an end-to-end request path.
* '''Agent''' – Lightweight process (Java, .NET, Node.js, Machine, DB) collecting telemetry.
* '''Controller''' – Central management server for configuration, baselines, dashboards.
* '''Synthetic Monitoring''' – Automated scripts to test uptime and latency.

=== Key components / actors / parts ===
* '''Application Agents''' – Capture code-level traces.
* '''Machine Agents''' – Capture host metrics (CPU, memory, I/O).
* '''Database Agents''' – Monitor query performance.
* '''End User Monitoring (EUM)''' – Browser/mobile telemetry.
* '''Network Visibility''' – Network flow latency and packet loss mapping.
* '''Controller (SaaS or On-Prem)''' – Aggregates all incoming telemetry.

=== Canonical tools & frameworks ===
* '''Flow Maps'''
* '''AppDynamics Dashboards'''
* '''AppDynamics Query Language (ADQL)'''
* '''Cisco Observability Platform'''

=== Where this topic commonly appears ===
* Enterprise software systems, finance, retail, telecommunications  
* Microservices architectures  
* Kubernetes & container orchestration  
* Performance engineering, SRE, DevOps  

=== Typical recall-level facts ===
* Founded: 2008  
* Acquired by Cisco: 2017  
* Competitors: Dynatrace, Datadog, New Relic  
* Category: APM & Observability  

----

== Understanding (Comprehension) ==
📖 Explain what the topic means, how it works conceptually, and how it relates to similar ideas.

=== Conceptual relationships & contrasts ===
* '''AppDynamics vs traditional monitoring''' – Traditional CPU/RAM monitoring vs AppDynamics’ transaction-based, code-level tracing.
* '''AppDynamics vs other observability platforms''' – More focus on business transaction context; others often focus on metrics/logs first.

=== Core principles & paradigms ===
* Dynamic baselining of performance trends  
* End-to-end transaction tracing  
* Flow-map visualization across distributed services  
* Top-down triage from business metrics → code execution  

=== How it works (high-level) ===
* '''Inputs:''' Metrics, logs, traces, user experience events  
* '''Processes:''' Agents collect → Controller analyzes → Baselines created → Anomaly detection  
* '''Outputs:''' Alerts, flow maps, health rules, dashboards  

=== Roles & perspectives ===
* Builders (developers) – diagnose slow code  
* Operators (SRE/DevOps) – ensure availability and uptime  
* Stakeholders – correlate performance to business metrics  
* End users – benefit from improved response times  

----

== Applying (Use / Application) ==
🛠️ Show what someone can ''do'' with the topic.

=== "Hello, World" example ===
* Install an application agent  
* Connect to a controller  
* Run the app and open the Flow Map  
* Observe the first Business Transaction trace  

=== Core task loops ===
* Monitor → Detect → Analyze → Fix → Validate  
* Build custom dashboards  
* Set up synthetic tests  
* Configure health rules  

=== Frequently used commands / functions / actions ===
* Configure custom BT detection  
* Query data using ADQL  
* Create alerts and baselines  
* Review slow snapshots and call graphs  

=== Real-world use cases ===
* Debugging slow endpoints  
* Tracking database bottlenecks  
* Monitoring microservices on Kubernetes  
* Ensuring SLA compliance  
* Detecting regressions after deployments  

----

== Analyzing (Break Down / Analysis) ==
🔬 Demonstrate expert-level structural understanding and diagnostic reasoning.

=== Comparative analysis ===
* '''Dynatrace''' – more auto-discovery; AppD has deeper business-transaction view.  
* '''Datadog''' – broader cloud-native suite; AppD excels in enterprise BT tracing.  
* '''New Relic''' – strong unified platform; AppD favored in hybrid/on-prem setups.  

=== Failure modes & root causes ===
* BT explosion (too many detected automatically)  
* Missing telemetry due to agent misconfigurations  
* Controller connectivity issues  
* High-traffic overhead from overly deep instrumentation  
* Alert fatigue from poorly defined health rules  

=== Troubleshooting & observability techniques ===
* Review slow snapshots  
* Inspect call graphs and method timings  
* Check DB query execution plans  
* Compare pre/post-deployment metrics  
* Inspect agent logs for connectivity problems  

=== Structural insights ===
* '''Agents''' → Data collection  
* '''Controller''' → Normalization, baselines  
* '''Event Service''' → Analytics (ADQL)  
* '''Dashboards/UI''' → Visualization  
* Dependencies include JVM/CLR runtimes, containers, DB protocols, browser SDKs  

----

== Creating (Synthesis / Create) ==
🏗️ Demonstrate designing or building with the topic.

=== Design patterns & best practices ===
* Instrument critical flows first (checkout, login, search).  
* Enforce consistent tier naming conventions.  
* Manage BT naming to reduce fragmentation.  
* Version dashboards and rules across environments.  

=== Security, governance, or ethical considerations ===
* Mask/obfuscate PII  
* Enforce RBAC  
* Encrypt communication between agents and controller  
* Audit dashboard access  

=== Lifecycle management strategies ===
* Standardize agent versions  
* Promote dashboards and configs Dev → QA → Prod  
* Re-baseline after architecture changes  
* Archive deprecated applications  

=== Scalability & optimization patterns ===
* Use SaaS Controllers for large-scale environments  
* Shard apps into logical tiers  
* Tune sampling for high-throughput endpoints  
* Integrate with Cisco Observability Platform  

----

== Evaluating (Judgment / Evaluation) ==
⚖️ Assessing suitability, trade-offs, risks, or long-term value.

=== Evaluation frameworks & tools ===
* MTTR reduction  
* Apdex/user satisfaction  
* Release stability metrics  
* Transaction latency trends  

=== Maturity & adoption models ===
* Strong enterprise adoption (finance, telecom, retail)  
* Well documented and backed by Cisco  
* Supports cloud, hybrid, and on-prem equally well  

=== Key performance indicators ===
* Response time  
* Throughput  
* Error rates  
* Resource consumption  
* BT performance baselines  
* Conversion/UX impacts (via EUM)  

=== Strategic decision criteria ===
'''Use AppDynamics when:'''
* You need full-stack, code-level visibility with business context.  
* You operate hybrid or on-prem enterprise systems.  
* Executives need correlation between performance and revenue impact.  

'''Avoid AppDynamics if:'''
* You prefer lightweight, cloud-native, metrics-first tools.  
* You need low-cost monitoring for small environments.  

=== Holistic impact analysis ===
* Cost: Enterprise-level pricing  
* Maintainability: Requires BT rule governance  
* Learning curve: Moderate to high  
* Governance: Strong RBAC and auditability  
* Risks: Over-instrumentation, alert fatigue  

----

'''Linking Guidelines'''
* Replace placeholder links with Wikipedia links where available.  
* Use: '''[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Name Descriptive link text]'''  
* Internal wiki pages use: '''[[Article Name]]'''

[[Category:Application Monitoring]]