Editing AI Containment and the Alignment Problem (section)

== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Applying</span> ==
'''Modeling 'The Alignment Gap' (Evaluating 'Specification Quality' vs. 'Capability Level'):'''
<syntaxhighlight lang="python">
def evaluate_alignment_risk(capability_level, specification_quality, interpretability_score):
    """
    Shows why capability must not outpace alignment research.
    """
    # Risk = Capability^2 / (Specification * Interpretability)
    # Small gaps become catastrophic at high capability
    risk = (capability_level ** 2) / ((specification_quality * interpretability_score) + 0.01)
    
    if risk > 10000:
        return f"RISK: CRITICAL. (Misalignment at high capability is unrecoverable. Pause development)."
    elif risk > 1000:
        return f"RISK: HIGH. (Significant alignment gap. Invest heavily in interpretability)."
    elif risk > 100:
        return f"RISK: MODERATE. (Gap exists. Monitor closely)."
    else:
        return f"RISK: MANAGEABLE. (Alignment roughly keeping pace with capability)."

# Case: Near-AGI system (capability=90) with moderate alignment (spec=0.7, interp=0.3)
print(evaluate_alignment_risk(90, 0.7, 0.3))
</syntaxhighlight>

; Safety Landmarks
: '''Bostrom's ''Superintelligence'' (2014)''' → "The Foundational" "Warning": "Popularizing" the **"Alignment Problem"** for "Policy-Makers."
: '''OpenAI Safety Team''' → "Founded" to "Ensure" **"Beneficial AGI"**: "Produced" "RLHF" and "Constitutional AI" "Methods."
: '''Anthropic's ''Responsible Scaling Policy'' ''' → "The First" "Public" "Corporate" **"Commitment"** to "Pause Development" if "Safety Thresholds" are "Breached."
: '''The 'AI Seoul Summit' (2024)''' → "The First" "International Government Summit" on **"AI Safety"** — "Producing" the **"Seoul Declaration."**
</div>

<div style="background-color: #8B4500; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">