Editing Cyberpunk (section)

== Evaluating (Judgment / Evaluation) ⚖️ ==
=== Evaluation frameworks & tools ===
* Criteria: thematic depth, world coherence, originality of technology, social critique.
* Tools: narrative analysis, genre comparison, socio-technical assessment.

=== Maturity & adoption models ===
* Mature genre with continuous influence in film, literature, and games.
* Evolved into variations: postcyberpunk, biopunk, nanopunk.
* Global adoption through Japanese anime, Western novels, and multimedia franchises.

=== Key benefits & limitations ===
* Benefits: sharp critique of technology and capitalism, rich aesthetic, compelling conflicts.
* Limitations: risk of formulaic tropes, pessimistic bias, limited cultural perspectives if not diversified.

=== Strategic decision criteria ===
* Use cyberpunk when exploring tech-driven inequality or identity shifts.
* Avoid if story goals require optimism or expansive exploration beyond urban decay.
* Consider hybridization when aiming for fresh thematic angles.

=== Holistic impact analysis ===
* Influences tech discourse, aesthetic design, and cultural imagination.
* Shapes visual language of futurism (neon, holograms, grids).
* Future trajectory: expanded global perspectives, intersection with AI ethics, eco-cyberpunk hybrids.

[[Category:Science Fiction]]
[[Category:Cyberpunk]]
[[Category:Speculative Fiction]]