Editing
Smart Constitutions and the Codification of Law
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Understanding</span> == Smart constitutions are understood through '''Execution''' and '''Limits'''. '''1. The "Gap" Problem (Traditional Law)''': "The law says X, but practice is Y." * (See Article 677). "Traditional Law" has a "Gap" between "What" it "Says" and "What" it "Does" β "Created by" **"Corruption," "Delay," "Unequal Enforcement,"** and "Interpretive Discretion." * **"Smart Contracts"** "Eliminate" this "Gap" β "The Code" "Does" "Exactly" "What" it "Says," "Every Time." * "This is" "Both" the "Promise" (Equal Enforcement) and the "Peril" (Rigid, Error-Prone Code). * "Justice" can be **"Automated."** '''2. The "Immutability" Trap (Constitutional Rigidity)''': "What happens when the law is wrong and the code won't bend?" * (See Article 730). "Smart Contracts" are "Notoriously" "Difficult" to "Amend." * "A 'Smart Constitution'" with a "Bug" or "Unjust Provision" "Could" "Continue" to "Execute" "The Injustice" "Automatically" until "Amended." * "The 2016 DAO Hack" ($60M stolen, technically legal by the code) demonstrated this: **"Code is law"** can be "Unjust."** * "Rigidity" is **"The Price of Automation."** '''3. The "Interpretation" Gap (Ambiguity)''': "Law uses words, code uses logic." * (See Article 506). "Natural Language" is "Inherently" "Ambiguous." "Law" "Relies" on "Courts" to "Interpret" "Ambiguous" "Text" in "Context." * "Code" "Has No" "Ambiguity" β "It Does" "What" it "Says," "Regardless" of "Intent." * "Translating" "Legal Language" into "Code" "Requires" "Resolving" **"All" "Ambiguities"** "Upfront." * "Clarity" is **"Mandatory."** '''The 'Ethereum' Governance Crisis (2016)'''': "The DAO Hack" "Proved" that "Code-as-Law" has a **"Fundamental Legitimacy Problem."** "The Ethereum Community" "Chose" to "Fork" the "Blockchain" to "Reverse" "The Hack" β "Overriding" "The Code" with "Community Consensus." It proved that **"Human Override"** remains "Essential" even in "Automated Governance." </div> <div style="background-color: #8B0000; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to BloomWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
BloomWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information