Editing
Philosophy Of Language
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">Understanding</span> == Philosophy of language has been shaped by four transformative intellectual moments: '''Frege's semantic revolution''': Gottlob Frege (1848β1925) transformed logic and philosophy of language by distinguishing sense from reference. The planet Venus can be referred to as "the morning star" or "the evening star" β same reference, different sense. His key insight: the sense of an expression is its "mode of presentation" of its referent; this explains why "Hesperus is Phosphorus" is informative even though both names refer to Venus. Frege also introduced the notion of a function from objects to truth-values, enabling predicate logic and compositional semantics. '''Kripke's naming revolution''': Saul Kripke (''Naming and Necessity'', 1980) overturned the Russell-Frege description theory of names. Names are not disguised descriptions; they are rigid designators that refer directly to their objects through a historical causal chain. "Water" rigidly designates HβO in all possible worlds β even worlds where no one knows this. This enabled "necessary a posteriori" truths: "water is HβO" is necessarily true but knowable only empirically. It also means that names don't mean the same as any description β Aristotle would still be Aristotle even if he had never taught Alexander. '''The later Wittgenstein and meaning as use''': In ''Philosophical Investigations'', Wittgenstein abandoned his earlier picture theory of meaning (from the ''Tractatus''). He argued there is no essence of language, no private language (meaning requires public criteria), and meaning is use in a practice β a "form of life." The rule-following considerations: no fact about past practice determines future correct use; understanding is a kind of competence, not a mental state. '''Grice and the pragmatics revolution''': H.P. Grice distinguished what is said (the literal, truth-conditional content) from what is implicated (what is communicated beyond the literal). Implicatures arise from the assumption that speakers are cooperative. "Can you pass the salt?" literally asks about ability; it implicates a request. The four maxims β quantity, quality, relation, manner β generate implicatures when apparently violated. Grice's framework is the foundation of modern pragmatics and is deeply relevant to understanding natural language AI. </div> <div style="background-color: #8B0000; color: #FFFFFF; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 15px;">
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to BloomWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
BloomWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information